Re: pg_upgrade and epoch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_upgrade and epoch
Date
Msg-id 20140905233542.GG26717@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade and epoch  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade and epoch
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep  6, 2014 at 12:26:55AM +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > I have developed the attached patch which causes pg_upgrade to preserve
> > the transaction epoch.  I plan to apply this for PG 9.5.
> 
> I would say this is a simple bug and should be back patched to 9.4 and
> 9.3. We're only going to continue to get complaints from people
> running into this.

Yes, I did think about that, but it seems like a behavior change. 
However, it is tempting to avoid future bug reports about this.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and epoch
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Need Multixact Freezing Docs