On 2014-09-02 10:21:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to> writes:
> > For example:
>
> > UPDATE foo WHERE bar = 1; -- must affect exactly one row
> > PERFORM UPDATE foo WHERE bar = 1; -- can affect any number of rows
>
> FWIW, I agree with the position that this would be a completely wrong
> thing to do. UPDATE should work like it does in plain SQL. If you want
> a restriction to "exactly one row", that needs to be a modifier.
>
> I take no position on how the modifier should be spelled, though.
Personally I think
ONE ROW UPDATE ...
reads nicely and SQL-ish. But it's not very expandable to other numbers.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
