Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins
Date
Msg-id 20140829220834.GJ10109@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2014-08-26 22:04:03 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> That's all I see on a first-read through.

I think I fixed all of them. Thanks.

> There might be other
> issues, and I haven't checked through it in great detail for mundane
> bugs, but generally, I favor pressing on relatively rapidly toward a
> commit.  It seems highly likely that this idea is a big win, and if
> there's some situation in which it's a loss, we're more likely to find
> out with it in the tree (and thus likely to be tested by many more
> people) than by analysis from first principles.

Attached is the version I plan to commit after going over it again
tomorrow.

Andres Freund

--
 Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gianni Ciolli
Date:
Subject: Re: Why data of timestamptz does not store value of timezone passed to it?
Next
From: "Brightwell, Adam"
Date:
Subject: Re: RLS Design