Re: Selectivity estimation for inet operators - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Emre Hasegeli
Subject Re: Selectivity estimation for inet operators
Date
Msg-id 20140826094433.GA64854@hasegeli-2.local
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Selectivity estimation for inet operators  (Dilip kumar <dilip.kumar@huawei.com>)
Responses Re: Selectivity estimation for inet operators
Re: Selectivity estimation for inet operators
List pgsql-hackers
> I agree with you that we can support other join type and anti join later,
> If others don’t have any objection in doing other parts later I will mark as "Ready For Committer".

I updated the patch to cover semi and anti joins with eqjoinsel_semi().
I think it is better than returning a constant.  The new version
attached with the new version of the test script.  Can you please
look at it again and mark it as "ready for committer" if it seems okay
to you?

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.5: Memory-bounded HashAgg
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql latency & bgwriter not doing its job