Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> this might be difficult to call this as --concurrently.
> >> It might need to be change the name.
> >
> > I'm OK to say that as --concurrently if the document clearly
> > explains that restriction. Or --almost-concurrently? ;P
> By reading that I am thinking as well about a wording with "lock",
> like --minimum-locks.
Why not just finish up the REINDEX CONCURRENTLY patch.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
