* Noah Misch (noah@leadboat.com) wrote:
> [Due for a new subject line?]
Probably.
> Our grace period for active backends after unclean exit of one of their peers
> is low, milliseconds to seconds. Our grace period for active backends after
> unclean exit of the postmaster is unconstrained. At least one of those
> policies has to be wrong. Like Andres and Robert, I pick the second one.
Ditto for me. The postmaster going away really is a bad sign and the
confusion due to leftover processes is terrible for our users.
Thanks,
Stephen
