On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 07:22:13PM -0600, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:52:51PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> However, other than shared_preload_libraries, I can't think of a GUC
> >> which would benefit from this. Can you?
>
> > search_path?
>
> Given the security implications of search_path, assembling its value
> from independent parts sounds like a darn bad idea from here.
I can imagine someone wanting to prefix/suffix to search_path for a user
via ALTER USER.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +