Re: Obsolete ToDo Item? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Obsolete ToDo Item?
Date
Msg-id 20140804194653.GA29853@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Obsolete ToDo Item?  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 02:39:03PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I was reading trough the ToDo list in the Postgres Wiki and noticed that
>     one item for Fsync[1] seems to be obsolete:
>
>        Determine optimal fdatasync/fsync, O_SYNC/O_DSYNC options and whether
>     fsync does anything
>            Ideally this requires a separate test program like /contrib/
>     pg_test_fsync that can be run at initdb time or optionally later.
>
>     This was added with 9.1[2] , so I guess that item can be removed from the
>     Wiki page?
>
>
> The to-do item is not for pg_test_fsync to be created, but rather for initdb to
> automatically invoke pg_test_fsync and then analyze the results and use that
> analysis to set up the fsync method.
>
> But I do think this entry is obsolete.  If a certain method is "too fast", is
> that because the operating system lies and is not really syncing the data, or
> is it because you have a BBU/NVRAM in front of the disk?  Or because you aren't
> using spinning disk at all?  I don't think that there is any way for initdb to
> safely figure out what is going on just based on the outcome of some timing
> tests.  The person who purchased the hardware has to apply their knowledge.

TODO item removed.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Serge Fonville
Date:
Subject: Re: Help needed with postgres stats and math
Next
From: Jon Rosebaugh
Date:
Subject: Re: Joining on CTE is unusually slow?