On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 06:27:52PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> >> 9.4 beta docs are listed as "Current as of 2014-05-10".
> >> I'm assuming that's just a step we missed in the version stamping?
> >
> > No, what that means is that nobody has looked at the commit logs since
> > then to see if the 9.4 release notes need any updates. Since we don't
> > release-note simple bug fixes in a branch before the .0 release,
> > 9.4 isn't yet getting the same notes as the back branches; it requires
> > a scan of the commit logs with different criteria, ie look for feature
> > changes. And I didn't do that over the weekend (I barely got the
> > back-branch notes done :-().
>
> Ah. I just did a "git log" on it and saw there were a number of
> updates in the relnotes themselves, didn't reflect on the fact that
> nobody had checked them against *other* updates to the tree.
>
>
> > It will get done at least once before 9.4.0, but I suspect that any
> > changes as a result of that will be pretty minor, so I'm not terribly
> > upset that it didn't happen for beta2.
>
> Nope, I agree. I just thought it meant something else...
I will update them in the next few weeks so we are ready for final. I
normally would have done them before beta2 but was traveling.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
