Re: We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next?
Date
Msg-id 20140716152254.GG11811@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next?  (Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>)
Responses Re: We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next?  (Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>)
Re: We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-general
Shaun Thomas wrote:
> This:
>
> 23334|4293964274||||53c68b69.5b26|2014-07-16 09:25:45 CDT|ERROR:  could not access status of transaction 7150346
> 23334|4293964274||||53c68b69.5b26|2014-07-16 09:25:45 CDT|DETAIL:  Could not open file "pg_multixact/offsets/006D":
Nosuch file or directory. 
>
> Been doing it every ten seconds since yesterday.
>
> My log line prefix is this:
>
> log_line_prefix = '%p|%x|%u|%d|%r|%c|%t|'
>
> So the user, database, and connection source are all blank. The PID is different every time, too. Not sure what to
makeof that. 

It's an autovacuum worker, which is expected.  Just get rid of the 0000
file and all should be well.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Shaun Thomas
Date:
Subject: Re: We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next?
Next
From: Shaun Thomas
Date:
Subject: Re: We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next?