At 2014-07-02 16:47:16 -0400, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
>
> If we expect that the author is going to update the patch, the right
> state to use is "Waiting on author".
Quite so. That's how I understand it, and what I've been doing. But what
if we really *don't* expect the author to update the patch, but they do
it anyway? That's the only case I was referring to.
If the right thing to do is to open an entry in the next CF (as you said
earlier in your mail), that's all right with me.
-- Abhijit
