Re: Alternative to psql -c ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From James Le Cuirot
Subject Re: Alternative to psql -c ?
Date
Msg-id 20140625153711.48f9733b@red.yakaraplc.local
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Alternative to psql -c ?  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
Responses Re: Alternative to psql -c ?
Re: Alternative to psql -c ?
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:24:53 -0400
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:16:19PM +0100, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> > Same problem as stdin, the transactional behaviour is different.
> > There is the --single-transaction option but as the man page says...
> >
> > "If the script itself uses BEGIN, COMMIT, or ROLLBACK, this option
> > will not have the desired effects."
>
> Hmm.  I've _used_ transactions in such files, I'm pretty sure.  You
> don't need the --single-transaction setting for this, just do the
> BEGIN; and COMMIT; yourself.
>
> A

Sorry, you're missing the point. I'm trying not to alter the existing
behaviour of the Chef database cookbook which is used by countless
people to execute scripts big and small, with and without transactions.
If I just naively wrapped them all in BEGIN/COMMIT then it would
override any additional transactions within the scripts.

James


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: Alternative to psql -c ?
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: Alternative to psql -c ?