Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins
Date
Msg-id 20140622184023.GO30721@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2014-06-22 19:31:34 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Yes, that's roughly how the SLRU code works also, so sounds good.

Heh. I rather see that as an argument for it sounding bad :)

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL access to database attributes