Re: -DDISABLE_ENABLE_ASSERT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: -DDISABLE_ENABLE_ASSERT
Date
Msg-id 20140619224817.GE16260@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: -DDISABLE_ENABLE_ASSERT  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: -DDISABLE_ENABLE_ASSERT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2014-06-19 19:31:28 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-05-23 10:01:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > > The next question is whether to wait till after the branching with this?
> >
> > +1 for waiting (it's only a couple weeks anyway).  This isn't a
> > user-facing feature in any way, so I feel no urgency to ship it in 9.4.
>
> Here's my patch for this that I plan to apply later.

Hm, that missed a couple things. Updated patch attached. Besides adding
the missed documentation adjustments this also removes the -A
commandline/startup packet parameter since it doesn't serve a purpose
anymore.
Does anyone think we should rather keep -A and have it not to anything?
It seems fairly unlikely, but not impossible, that someone had the
great idea to add -A off in their connection options.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
 Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "MauMau"
Date:
Subject: Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: -DDISABLE_ENABLE_ASSERT