On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 01:18:24PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:29:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > > I think this is caused because the variable is not defined as SOCKET.
> > > > The attached patch fixes this. This should prevent the warning.
> > >
> > > Surely that's just going to move the errors somewhere else. The call
> > > site still expects the argument to be int[].
> >
> > Ah, yes, you are right. This is a similar problem I had with libpq
> > where PQsocket() had to return an int.
> >
> > Attached is an updated patch which follows my previous coding of
> > checking for PGINVALID_SOCKET, and if not equal, assigns the value to an
> > integer handle. I would also like to rename variable 's' to
> > 'listen_sock', but that is not in the patch, for clarity reasons.
> >
> > Should this be held for 9.5? I think it is only warning removal. On
> > the other hand, portability is what we do during beta testing.
>
> I think this should go in 9.4, but as you say it's only warning removal
> so there is probably little point in patching further back (this code
> dates back to 9.3.)
Agreed and applied.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
