Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max
Date
Msg-id 20140604225906.GK785@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2014-06-03 10:37:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It hasn't even got a comment saying why changes here should
> receive any scrutiny; moreover, it's not in a file where changes would be
> likely to excite suspicion.  (Probably it should be in opr_sanity, if
> we're going to have such a thing at all.)

I've written up the attached patch that moves the test to opr_sanity and
adds a littlebit of commentary. Will apply unless somebody protests in
the next 24h or so.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
 Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_control is missing a field for LOBLKSIZE
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Sigh, we need an initdb