On 2014-05-19 09:53:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think throwing an error out of a SIGBUS handler is right out. There
> would be no way to know exactly what code we were interrupting. It's
> the same reason we don't let, eg, the SIGALRM handler throw a timeout
> error directly (in most places anyway).
Agreed. I think if we really, really feel the need to do something about
this - which I don't - we could allocate a separate stack very early on
and use that.
> >> * PostgreSQL allocates lots of heap using brk() instead of mmap()
>
> > It doesn't really do that, btw. It's the libc's mmap that makes those
> > decisions, not postgres.
>
> It occurs to me that maybe this is a glibc bug, not a kernel bug?
You think malloc() should try to be careful when calling brk() and check
beforehand wether it'll conflict with stack_base + RLIMIT_STACK? That's
not a bad argument, but it still seems a really bad choice to leave that
little space for the heap. Especially when it's dependant on -pie being
used.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
