Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes
Date
Msg-id 20140430195750.GA6018@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Greg Stark (stark@mit.edu) wrote:

> > I could do the legwork on either the GUC or moving hash indexes to an
> > extension if there's a consensus. But I suspect either will be quite
> > controversial...

> If you'd like to build an extension which provides hash indexes- I say
> go for it?  Nothing stopping you as far as that's concerned.

Extensions can't write/replay WAL, so it's not clear to me how would this
work.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Darren Duncan
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: bgworker crashed or not?