Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Date
Msg-id 20140421173709.GG25695@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  (Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> How high on the hierarchy of PostgreSQL's "needs" is making a single
> option a tunable versus compile time thing?  I mean seriously you
> mean to stick on this one point when one of your users are asking
> you about this?   That is pretty concerning to me.

I think the sticking point here is that the problem affects a single
platform, and it can easily be construed as a platform bug.  For
problems that affect PostgreSQL as a whole for everybody, we hesitate a
lot less when it comes to creating new runtime options.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alfred Perlstein
Date:
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Next
From: Alfred Perlstein
Date:
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD