Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Date
Msg-id 20140421154901.GF14024@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2014-04-21 11:45:49 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> That seems to make more sense. I can't imagine why this would be a runtime
> parameter as opposed to build time.

Because that implies that packagers and porters need to make that
decision. If it's a GUC people can benchmark it and decide.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD