Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-04-18 11:50:55 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > It's a bit painful that HeapTupleHeaderGetUpdateXid allocates memory,
> > but to fix that we would have to remove all allocations from
> > GetMultiXactIdMembers which doesn't sound feasible.
>
> I was thinking for a second we could just allocate something during
> startup based on max_connections (+ other possible backends), but I
> think that won't work because of subtransactions?
Yeah, I don't think the number of members in a multixact is bound.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
