Re: assertion in 9.4 with wal_level=logical - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: assertion in 9.4 with wal_level=logical
Date
Msg-id 20140417203347.GA17874@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to assertion in 9.4 with wal_level=logical  (Steve Singer <steve@ssinger.info>)
Responses Re: assertion in 9.4 with wal_level=logical  (Steve Singer <steve@ssinger.info>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2014-04-17 16:23:54 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
> With master/9.4 from today (52e757420fa98a76015c2c88432db94269f3e8f4)
> 
> I am getting an assertion when doing a truncate via SPI when I have
> wal_level=logical.
> 
> Stack trace is below.
> 
> I am just replicating a table with normal slony (2.2) I don't need to
> establish any replication slots to get this.

Uh, that's somewhat nasty... You probably only get that because of
slony's habit of share locking catalogs. Could that be?

For now, to circumvent the problem you could just revert
4a170ee9e0ebd7021cb1190fabd5b0cbe2effb8e for now.

I'll look into fixing it properly.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?