On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:54:04PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> > Which is another way of doing it, I guess. I'm not sure why the usual way
> > wasn't adopted there.
> Perhaps it was simply forgotten, it is done like that since pg_upgrade
> a couple of years back with c2e9b2f.
Yes, I think Sleep() was left over from when pg_upgrade was not in
contrib. I have committed a patch to use pg_usleep(). Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +