Re: psql blows up on BOM character sequence - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: psql blows up on BOM character sequence
Date
Msg-id 20140325.092845.1908431098781098182.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql blows up on BOM character sequence  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: psql blows up on BOM character sequence  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> The code would probably be pretty trivial, *if* we had consensus on
> what the behavior ought to be.  I'm not sure if we do.  People who
> only use Unicode would probably like it if BOMs were unconditionally
> swallowed, whether or not psql thinks the client_encoding is UTF8.
> (And I seem to recall somebody even proposing that finding a BOM
> be cause to switch the client_encoding to UTF8.)

This is a bad idea. ISO 8859-1 uses 0xfe and 0xff (BOM) for some
characters.

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: About adding an attribute to pg_attibute
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Useless "Replica Identity: NOTHING" noise from psql \d