On 2014-03-18 17:34:34 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2014-03-18 16:19:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > > > On 2014-03-18 19:28:53 +0000, Greg Stark wrote:
> > > >> It would be nice to be able to tell people that if they vacuum, then
> > > >> reindex and check all their foreign key constraints then they should
> > > >> be ok.
> > >
> > > > I don't think so:
> > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20140317233919.GS16438%40awork2.anarazel.de
> > >
> > > > I still think a rewriting noop ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN col TYPE
> > > > old_type USING (col); is the only real thing to do.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, the operative word in that is "noop". Didn't you see
> > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/11964.1395100860@sss.pgh.pa.us
> >
> > Huh, that somehow never arrived here. Very odd.
>
> 2014-03-18 00:01:18 [10067] 1WPhT4-0002cN-F3 <= pgsql-hackers-owner+M246803=andres=anarazel.de@postgresql.org
H=localhost(postgresql.org) [127.0.0.1] P=smtp S=3502 id=11964.1395100860@sss.pgh.pa.us
> 2014-03-18 00:01:18 [10067] 1WPhT4-0002cN-F3 <= pgsql-hackers-owner+M246803=andres=anarazel.de@postgresql.org
H=localhost(postgresql.org) [127.0.0.1] P=smtp S=3502 id=11964.1395100860@sss.pgh.pa.us
> 2014-03-18 00:01:19 [10170] 1WPhT4-0002cN-F3 => andres@anarazel.de R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp H=mail.anarazel.de
[217.115.131.40]X=TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128 QT=1s DT=1s
> 2014-03-18 00:01:19 [10170] 1WPhT4-0002cN-F3 Completed QT=1s
Mail that's CC/TOed to me onlist, is automatically marked as read by a
sieve script so I don't have to mark it as read twice. It seems
something went wrong there for a couple of messages...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
