Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1
Date
Msg-id 20140317131637.GD16438@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1
List pgsql-hackers
On 2014-03-17 09:13:38 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >> Perhaps there could be a switch for an fsync interval, or something
> >> like that.  The default could be, say, to fsync every 10 seconds.  And
> >> if you want to change it, then go ahead; 0 disables.  Writing to
> >> standard output would be documented as unreliable.  Other ideas
> >> welcome.
> >
> > Hm. That'll be a bit nasty. fsync() is async signal safe, but it's still
> > forbidden to be called from a signal on windows IIRC. I guess we can
> > couple it with the standby_message_timeout stuff.
> 
> Eh... I don't see any need to involve signals.  I'd just check after
> each write() whether enough time has passed, or something like that.

What if no new writes are needed? Because e.g. there's either no write
activity on the primary or all writes are in another database or
somesuch?
I think checking in sendFeedback() is the best bet...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: HEAD seems to generate larger WAL regarding GIN index