Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9
Date
Msg-id 20140303224325.GJ17253@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Robert, Everyone!

On 2014-03-03 16:48:15 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> OK, I've committed the 0001 patch, which is the core of this feature,
> with a bit of minor additional hacking.

Many, many, thanks!

> I'm sure there are some problems here yet and some things that people
> will want fixed, as is inevitable for any patch of this size.  But I
> don't have any confidence that further postponing commit is going to
> be the best way to find those issues, so in it goes.

Unsurprisingly I do agree with this. It's a big feature, and there's
imperfection. But I think it's a good start.

A very first such imperfection is that the buildfarm doesn't actually
excercise make check in contribs, just make installcheck... Which this
patch doesn't use because the tests require wal_level=logical and
max_replication_slots >= 2. Andrew said on IRC that maybe it's a good
idea to add a make-contrib-check stage to the buildfarm.

A patch fixing a couple of absolutely trivial things is attached.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
 Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Next
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)