Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Date
Msg-id 20140303185846.GB3476935@tornado.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:43:46PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> The question is are there any specific areas of concern here? If not,
> then we commit because we've done a lot of work on it and at the
> moment the balance is high benefit to users against a non-specific
> feeling of risk.
> 
> @Noah - Last call...

I am not specifically aware of any outstanding problems.  I have planned to
give this a close look, but it will be at least two weeks before I dig out far
enough to do so.  If that makes it a post-commit review, so be it.

-- 
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB                                 http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: UNION ALL on partitioned tables won't use indices.