Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?
Date
Msg-id 20140219235533.GB3391@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2014-02-19 12:47:40 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Yes, that's a good precedent in multiple ways.
> > Here are updated patches to use pg_lsn instead of pglsn...
> 
> OK, so I think this stuff is all committed now, with assorted changes.
>  Thanks for your work on this.

cool, thanks you two.

I wonder if pg_stat_replication shouldn't be updated to use it as well?
SELECT * FROM pg_attribute WHERE attname ~ '(location|lsn)'; only shows
that as names that are possible candidates for conversion.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST support for inet datatypes
Next
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Priority table or Cache table