On 2014-02-12 13:33:31 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-02-12 21:23:54 +0900, MauMau wrote:
> > Maybe we could consider in that direction, but there is a problem. Archive
> > recovery slows down compared to 9.1, because of repeated restartpoints.
> > Archive recovery should be as fast as possible, because it typically applies
> > dozens or hundreds of WAL files, and the DBA desires immediate resumption of
> > operation.
> >
> > So, I think we should restore 9.1 behavior for archive recovery.
>
> It's easy to be fast, if it's not correct. I don't see how that
> behaviour is acceptable, imo the previous behaviour simply was a bug
> whose fix was too invasive to backpatch.
>
> I don't think you can convince me (but maybe others) that the old
> behaviour is acceptable.
I'm going to mark this patch as "Rejected". Please speak up if that's
not accurate.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
