Re: issue with gininsert under very high load - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: issue with gininsert under very high load
Date
Msg-id 20140212200635.GA2921@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: issue with gininsert under very high load  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Andres Freund (andres@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> There's previously been talk about changing the limits to something more
> reasonable but it got stalled in bikeshedding IIRC.

As I recall, there was argument that we didn't really need a new GUC for
this (which was the proposal) but rather just need to pick a reasonable
(small) value and hard-code it.  Are there objections to doing so, or
are there cases where that would be a serious problem?  How do people
feel about 4MB?
Thanks,
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Recovery inconsistencies, standby much larger than primary
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Recovery inconsistencies, standby much larger than primary