On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 09:12:03AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >> So do we want to keep that "AND" in the 9.3beta and 9.4 documentation?
> >
> > The grammar as in gram.y still allows the AND form, and I think we're
> > used to maintain documentation that matches the code here. So I think it
> > makes sense to remove both capabilities as we failed to deliver any
> > other filter.
> >
> > But if we wanted to clean that, what about having the grammar check for
> > the only one item we support rather than waiting until into
> > CreateEventTrigger() to ereport a syntax error?
>
> I have found that it's generally better to recognize such errors in
> the post-parse phase rather than during parsing. When you start
> adding more options, that tends to quickly become the only workable
> option anyway.
OK, so I am assuming there is no additional work to do this area. Thanks.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
