* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> You shouldn't really raise that argument against the guy who made the
> original commit in question ;-).
Figures. :) Not sure how I missed that.
[...]
Right, I had followed that.
> Now ideally, the way we do that is to reconnect its stderr to /dev/null,
> but if either the open(DEVNULL) or the dup2() calls were to fail, it will
> presumably still work to leave the file descriptors just-plain-closed.
> If the syslogger process then attempts to write on stderr, libc's internal
> write() calls will fail, but so what? We wanted the output to go to the
> bit bucket anyhow.
Ok, I see your point that it wouldn't much matter if we tried to
complain at this point about the dup2() calls failing.
> In short, this patch was ill considered. Please revert. If we need
> to silence a Coverity complaint, perhaps a cast-to-void will do?
Sure, I'll adjust it accordingly.
Thanks,
Stephen
