> I know about PostgresXC, but I thought it is distributed database (similar
> to shards of mongoDB). [Though if I am correct there could be tables which
> are shared across different nodes, but that is not the best way of
> utilizing features of PostgresXC] I think it is not apt to call it
> "synchronous" (since there is no replication happening).
I thought non "eventual consistency" type DB can be called
"synchronous", no? If I am correct, Posgres-XC is definitely
synchronous.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
