On 2014-01-16 11:19:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think the usecases that would want this for DML probably also wan this
> > to work for unlogged, temp tables.
>
> Huh? Unlogged tables generate *zero* WAL, by definition.
Yes. That's my point. If we provide it as a generic resource control -
which what's being discussed here sounds to me - it should be generic.
If we provide as a measure to prevent standbys from getting out of date
due to maintenance commands, then it only needs to cover those.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
