* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> But in a
> SELECT, the effect is only that you will have to skip less dead tuples,
> which is not as exciting.
Agreed. There's also the option to have it be done based on some
expectation of future work- that is, if we have to traverse X number of
dead tuples during a select, then don't bother with HOT pruning, but if
we get up to X+Y dead tuples, then do HOT pruning.
That said, I'm not entirely convinced that traversing these dead tuples
is all *that* painful during SELECT. If there's that many levels then
hopefully it's not long til an UPDATE comes along and cleans them up.
Thanks,
Stephen
