Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze
Date
Msg-id 20131220191718.GD22570@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas escribió:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> > I assume without checking that passing reloid/ctid would allow this to
> > work for tuples in a RETURNING clause; and if we ever have an OLD
> > reference for the RETURNING clause of an UPDATE, that it would work
> > there, too, showing the post-update status of the updated tuple.
> 
> I don't understand what you're saying here.  Are you saying that
> reloid/ctid is a better approach, a worse approach, or just a
> different approach?

That probably wasn't worded very well.  I am just saying that whatever
approach we end up with, it would be nice that it worked somehow with
RETURNING clauses.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information