Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze
Date
Msg-id 20131219203643.GM11006@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas escribió:

> I think it may have been a mistake to divide responsibility between
> the prepare and execute functions the way we did in this case, because
> it doesn't appear to be a clean separation of concerns.  But it's not
> this patch's job to kibitz that decision, so this version just fits in
> with the way things are already being done there.

If you want to change how it works, feel free to propose a patch; I'm
not in love with what we're doing, honestly, and I did propose the idea
of using some flag bits instead of the whole mask, but didn't get any
traction.  (Not that that thread had a lot of participants.)

Or are you suggesting that I should do it?  I would have welcomed
feedback when I was on that, but I have moved on to other things now,
and I don't want to be a blocker for the forensic freeze patch.

Anyway I think if we want to change it, the time is now, before we
release 9.3.3.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: gaussian distribution pgbench
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: FK locking concurrency improvement