Re: 9.3 reference constraint regression - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: 9.3 reference constraint regression
Date
Msg-id 20131218165051.GE11006@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.3 reference constraint regression  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> 
> > I have to say, it makes me really uncomfortable to take such
> > shortcuts. In other branches we are doing liveliness checks with
> > MultiXactIdIsRunning() et al. Why isn't that necessary here? And how
> > likely is that this won't cause breakage somewhere down the line because
> > somebody doesn't know of that subtlety?
> 
> I came up with the attached last night, which should do the right thing
> in both cases.

That one had a silly bug, which I fixed and pushed now.

Thanks for the feedback,

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Florian Weimer
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Async query processing
Next
From: Cédric Villemain
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_rewarm status