Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Date
Msg-id 20131207155615.GB21734@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2013-12-07 13:58:11 +0000, Greg Stark wrote:
> FATAL means a backend died. It is kind of vague how FATAL and PANIC
> differ.

I don't really see much vagueness there. FATAL is an unexpected but
orderly shutdown. PANIC is for the situations where we can't handle the
problem that occurred in any orderly way.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Johnston
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?