On 2013-11-28 11:10:12 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:20:22AM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > On 2013-11-28 11:17:44 +0100, Strahinja Kustudi=C4=87 wrote:
> > > Thanks for the suggestion, but I already initialized a fresh stand =
by from
> > > master, since I didn't have time to do more testing, so I can't try=
that
> > > now. Is this the same bug which was announced a few days ago about =
possible
> > > DB corruption on HS, because if I understood correctly only version=
9.1.10
> > > was problematic and not 9.1.9?
> >=20
> > No, it's actually not - the (buggy) bug fix for the issue you're havi=
ng
> > caused the problem in 9.1.10. So 9.1.11 will contain the corrected
> > version...
>=20
> I believe all the issues are summarized here:
>=20
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Nov2013ReplicationIssue
Note that the OP is not hitting the bug that can cause actual corruption
in the standby that's discussed on that page.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--=20
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
