Re: [PATCH] Use MAP_HUGETLB where supported (v3) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [PATCH] Use MAP_HUGETLB where supported (v3)
Date
Msg-id 20131121211435.GA14939@alap2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Use MAP_HUGETLB where supported (v3)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Use MAP_HUGETLB where supported (v3)  (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-11-21 18:09:38 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> > At 2013-11-15 15:17:32 +0200, hlinnakangas@vmware.com wrote:
> 
> > > But I'm not wedded to the idea if someone objects; a log message might
> > > also be reasonable: "LOG: huge TLB pages are not supported on this
> > > platform, but huge_tlb_pages was 'on'"
> > 
> > Put that way, I have to wonder if the right thing to do is just to have
> > a "try_huge_pages=on|off" setting, and log a warning if the attempt did
> > not succeed. It would be easier to document, and I don't think there's
> > much point in making it an error if the allocation fails.
> 
> What about
> huge_tlb_pages={off,try}
> 
> Or maybe
> huge_tlb_pages={off,try,require}

I'd certainly want a setting that errors out if it cannot get the memory
using hugetables. If you rely on the reduction in memory (which can be
significant on large s_b, large max_connections), it's rather annoying
not to know whether it suceeded using it.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1