Re: Autoconf 2.69 update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Autoconf 2.69 update
Date
Msg-id 20131120145858.GG25406@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autoconf 2.69 update  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Autoconf 2.69 update  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-11-20 09:53:53 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> As a rule, you're not supposed to bother including the configure output
> script in a submitted diff anyway.  Certainly any committer worth his
> commit bit is going to ignore it and redo autoconf for himself.

The committer maybe, but it's a PITA for reviewers on machines without
the matching autoconf version around. Which at least currently
frequently isn't packaged anymore...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Autoconf 2.69 update
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Issue warning when calling SET TRANSACTION outside transaction block