Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1
Date
Msg-id 20131118205703.GA24195@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1  (Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>)
Responses Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1  (Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-11-18 10:58:26 -0800, Christophe Pettus wrote:
> After promotion, it was discovered that there was significant data
> loss on S1.  Rows that were present on P1 were missing on S1, and some
> rows were duplicated (including duplicates that violated primary key
> and other unique constraints).  The indexes were corrupt, in that they
> seemed to think that the duplicates were not duplicated, and that the
> missing rows were still present.

Were there any kind of patterns in the lost data? What kind of workload
are they running? I have an idea what the issue might be...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: unaccent module - two params function should be immutable
Next
From: Christophe Pettus
Date:
Subject: Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1