On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 01:45:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> > If we wanted to change the defaults, I think it would be easier to
> > create a separate bin name (e.g. pg_backup) than to change the
> > existing parameters for pg_dump.
>
> That might work. However, just to be contrary: what about the
> functionality of pg_dumpall? We've heard repeated complaints about
> pg_dump's lack of ability to dump multiple databases or global
> settings, and just institutionalizing the existing -Fc format as the
> default will make it harder not easier to fix that.
>
> I'd be happier about inventing a pg_backup if it were a replacement
> for pg_dumpall and not just a cosmetic wrapper.
That the two are still separate is idiotic. If it were me waving this
wand, I'd see to it that -Fd (directory) rather than -Fc (custom), was
the default for pg_backup, as it makes the choice to use -j (>1 core)
trivial. I'd also make sure that the directory format could handle
the entirety of the backed-up database in some comprehensible way.
Maybe a globals/ and a databases/ directory up top...
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
