Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs
Date
Msg-id 20131018203511.GF16188@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-10-18 13:16:52 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 10/18/2013 12:29 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2013-10-18 09:32:15 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> For that matter, 9.4 is a very good time (relatively speaking) to break
> >> replication tools because the new logical replication is going to cause
> >> everyone to rev their tools anyway.
> > 
> > We're hopefully getting changeset extraction in, but there's little
> > chance of a full blown replication solution making it in in 9.4...
> 
> I thought changeset extraction was the only thing going into core?  What
> else do we need?

Well, I personally want more in core mid/long term, but anyway.

Without released, proven and stable logical in-core replication
technology using this, I don't see why repmgr or something related would
need/want to change?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: space reserved for WAL record does not match what was written: panic on windows