Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date
Msg-id 20131010073855.GD3825719@alap2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-10-02 13:16:06 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Each patch applied with its parents compiles, has no warnings AFAIK
> and passes regression/isolation tests. Working on 0004 by the end of
> the CF seems out of the way IMO, so I'd suggest focusing on 0002 and
> 0003 now, and I can put some time to finalize them for this CF. I
> think that we should perhaps split 0003 into 2 pieces, with one patch
> for the introduction of index_concurrent_build, and another for
> index_concurrent_set_dead. Comments are welcome about that though, and
> if people agree on that I'll do it once 0002 is finalized.

FWIW I don't think splitting of index_concurrent_build is worthwile...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PSQL return coder
Next
From: "Etsuro Fujita"
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for fast gin cache performance improvement