Re: Minmax indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Minmax indexes
Date
Msg-id 20130930164907.GF5235@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Minmax indexes  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: Minmax indexes
List pgsql-hackers
David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 02:17:39PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > What would it take to abstract the minmax indexes to allow maintaing
> > a bounding box for points, instead of a plain min/max? Or for
> > ranges. In other words, why is this restricted to b-tree operators?
> 
> If I had to guess, I'd guess, "first cut."

Yeah, there were a few other simplifications in the design too, though I
admit allowing for multidimensional dataypes hadn't occured to me
(though I will guess Simon did think about it and just didn't tell me to
avoid me going overboard with stuff that would make the first version
take forever).

I think we'd better add version numbers and stuff to the metapage to
allow for extensions and proper upgradability.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Minmax indexes
Next
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition