Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names
Date
Msg-id 20130919091819.GF8288@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-09-18 11:02:50 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-09-18 11:55:24 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> > > I think that ship has long since sailed. postgresql.conf has allowed
> > > foo.bar style GUCs via custom_variable_classes for a long time, and
> > > these days we don't even require that but allow them generally. Also,
> > > SET, postgres -c, and SELECT set_config() already don't have the
> > > restriction to one dot in the variable name.
> >
> > It's even explained in document that a two-part name is allowed for
> > Customized Options at link:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/runtime-config-custom.html
>
> Oh I somehow missed that. I'll need to patch that as well.

Updated patch attached.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
 Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: record identical operator
Next
From: Sawada Masahiko
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup