Re: A question about the psql \copy command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: A question about the psql \copy command
Date
Msg-id 20130910233637.GI16378@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to A question about the psql \copy command  ("Etsuro Fujita" <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb  7, 2013 at 09:45:17PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> Through the work on the patch [1], I had a question about the psql \copy
> command.  We are permitted 1) but not permitted 2):
> 1) \copy foo from stdin ;
> 2) \copy foo from stdin;
> Is this intentional?  I think it would be better to allow for 2).  Attached is a
> patch.

Modified, attached patch applied.  Thanks.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Issue warning when calling SET TRANSACTION outside transaction block
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: unaccent module - two params function should be immutable